- Andrew Richardson
- Software engineer, business owner, husband, runner and member of my pack of four-legged girls.
- 2013 (91)
- 2012 (411)
- ∴ Who Gets Your Vote
- F-35B Suitability Tests
- Verizon Reverses Decision To Charge $2 Fee
- Keynes, and Krugman, Were Right
- Would You Meet Here?
- Robert Reich: It's Obama-Clinton 2012
- Merry Christmas from Andrew, Kelly, Zele and Stell...
- Chinese Restaurant Sign Thanks Jews for Eating The...
- A Leg Up On Bad Customer Service With Insidr
- A Bit of Christmas Silliness
- Samsung: No ICS Upgrade for Galaxy S and Galaxy Ta...
- No Ice Cream Sandwich For Galaxy S And Galaxy Tab
- Shawn Blanc Reviews Galaxy Nexus S
- Mysterious Metal Ball From Space Falls in Namibia
- James Bond Producers Want Daniel Craig For Five Mo...
- NBC Will Stream Super Bowl Broadcast Live
- Well, It Sure Seems Like Keynes Was Right
- Why the iPad Is the Most Hated Gadget Ever
- Marissa Mayer Is Off Larry Page's Special Advisory...
- Young Couple Buried Under Tons of Coal in Florida
- Apples A5 Processors Made on Samsung Production Li...
- Could Netflix Bring Firefly Back From The Dead?
- Four HMMVs, Inbound
- American Airlines First To Allow Pilot iPads on th...
- TextMate 2.0 Public Alpha
- Why Apps Are Not the Future
- Verizon Rumored Serious About Netflix Bid
- Granderson: Gingrich Has it Wrong About the Poor
- Two Zero-day Vulnerabilities Found in Flash Player...
- Followup: Air Force Dumped Troops' Remains in Land...
- The 5 Best Toys of All Time
- Why the GOP Field Is So Weak
- Apple TV Updates Stream Purchased TV shows to Aust...
- Best of the Unimpressed Astronaut Meme
- S&P: Entire 27-nation EU is At Risk of Downgrade
- Air Force Dumped Troops' Remains in Landfill
- Motorola Update on Ice Cream Sandwich
- HP Is Reviving The $99 TouchPad Firesale!
- Colonel Potter Dead
- Baggage Handler Fired For Helping Sick Dog Can Hav...
- 25 Heroic Dogs
- DirecTV's TiVo Ready to Return
- Will Indy Die in 'Indiana Jones 5'?
- The 45 Most Powerful Images of 2011
- The Fed's $7 Trillion Secret Loan Program
- Near-Bankrupt US Postal Service Plans Unprecedente...
- Send In the Clueless
- How to Sync Unread Tweets Between iPhone, iPad and...
- Zakaria: Why I now think Assad will fall
- Killing the Euro
- ∴ Stout Made in Oak Barrels Returns to NoVA
- Kindle Fire, Not the Netbook of the Tablet Market
- Microsoft’s New Resilient File System (ReFS) Will ...
- 2010 (23)
I wrote about the US Air Force’s egregious practice of disposing deceased veterans’ remains in a landfill yesterday, noting that there seemed to be information missing. Something didn’t add up.
Last evening’s news programs added a bit more perspective. While it still appears there was a violation of honor in the way these veterans’ remains were treated, it’s not quite as clear-cut as earlier reporting indicated.
It is apparently not the case that service members died in action, their bodies were returned to the US and disposed, intact, in a landfill.
It’s more like service members were violently killed in action, their bodies mutilated beyond recognition, and their remains gathered and returned to the US. Samples of the remains were taken for DNA testing in order to make positive identification. The rest of the remains were transferred to next of kin for burial.
The samples taken for DNA testing, but not needed, as well as samples not identified were cremated and discarded in a Virginia landfill.
CNN has additional detail:
When bodies are not intact — for instance, in the aftermath of a crash or explosion — a body may be released to the family before some parts have been identified by the Air Force Mortuary at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware. Families can elect to be notified when parts are identified or leave it up to the military to dispose of them appropriately. Since the policy was changed in 2008, the unclaimed body parts are buried at sea.
There’s plenty of shame to be had in this unfolding story, not the least of which was evident on the face of a uniformed Pentagon officer who stopped cold after describing the discarded remains as “medical waste” to reporters.
That may well have been an accurate description for remains not needed for identification, but it’s a cold way of describing a soldier’s remains after he’s given his life in combat.